From rules: If Daniel works, Eve is not.

Unlock all questions

This demo includes only 20 questions. Upgrade to access hundreds of questions, flashcards, exam simulations, and disable ads.

Full question bankExam simulationsFlashcards
From $24.99Unlock all

Prepare for the Progressive Pre-Employment Assessment Test with targeted practice questions. Sharpen your skills with detailed explanations and hints. Ace your assessment!

Multiple Choice

From rules: If Daniel works, Eve is not.

Explanation:
The main concept here is recognizing a conditional rule and identifying its direct consequence. The rule states that if Daniel works, Eve does not work. The best option is the one that repeats exactly that relationship: If Daniel works, Eve does not work. It matches the given rule without adding anything else. The other statements don’t fit because they either state the opposite (that Eve would work if Daniel works), claim something about what happens when Daniel does not work that isn’t specified, or connect Eve not working to Daniel working in a way that isn’t implied by the rule. Also, the contrapositive would be If Eve works, Daniel does not work, not If Eve does not work, Daniel works.

The main concept here is recognizing a conditional rule and identifying its direct consequence. The rule states that if Daniel works, Eve does not work. The best option is the one that repeats exactly that relationship: If Daniel works, Eve does not work. It matches the given rule without adding anything else.

The other statements don’t fit because they either state the opposite (that Eve would work if Daniel works), claim something about what happens when Daniel does not work that isn’t specified, or connect Eve not working to Daniel working in a way that isn’t implied by the rule. Also, the contrapositive would be If Eve works, Daniel does not work, not If Eve does not work, Daniel works.

More Multiple Choice Questions
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy